| Review Name | Review Number | Status | | Due Date | Start Date | Complete Date | | Comments |
| AIRPORT AUTHORITY REVIEW | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | N |
| Sheriff's Review | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/15/2024 | 4/19/2024 | | Y |
| PCPTED000001:SIGNAGE Due to the number of gas pumps and parking spots, I request the pump numbers be clearly visible to first responders as they approach the property. I also request the parking rowes are labeled and visible to the first responders as they approach. This could help in response times to emergencies in the parking lots and gas pump areas due to the size of this project. |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/9/2024 | 7/8/2024 | | Y |
| PMAJSPR00039:28-249.B.7 EXISTING RD/ESMTS.. Is the existing ROW cutting through the site being abandoned? Can this be utilized for access directly into site? (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00075:28-249.B.21 EXSTNG/PROPOSED ST There may be issues with stacking for vehicles exiting this site at the Sunflower Drive intersection. There is only one left turn lane exiting the site onto Austin Ridge Drive southbound towards Courthouse Road, which is the most direct exit point for traffic getting back towards I-95. The proposed entrances off of Austin Ridge Dr have little internal stacking area. Consider expanding internal stacking areas and adding a second left out at the signalized intersection. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00080:28-249.B.21 STREET NAME Please confirm that Buc-ee’s Blvd is an acceptable street name, as it was mentioned there is a Board resolution assigning a different name for this road. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Please provide sidewalks along Austin Ridge Dr. Consider making the sidewalks 8’ width for consistency with adjacent PD-2 developments. Also please provide internal sidewalks for safety from the parking lot to the store and gas station areas (consider something similar to Bass Pro Shops in Ashland). Consider adding a bike trail connecting the proposed bike plaza to the shared use path along Courthouse Rd. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00185:28-39.I.28 LANDSCAPING PLAN Please remove sheet C3.1 and the landscaping schedules and specific plantings shown on sheet C3.0. Proposed planting areas can be generally identified/shaded and dimensioned in layout view. Specific landscape requirements and planting arrangements are to be evaluated with site plan review. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00185:28-39.I.28 LANDSCAPING PLAN A 60' interstate buffer will be required where the property abuts the I-95 exit ramp. Please show this on the GDP. Consider preserving existing trees in this area and crediting them towards the landscape buffer requirement. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00235:28-87 PARKING LOT LIGHTING Please remove the parking lot lighting features, as they are reviewed under the site plan requirements and not a GDP. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00039:28-249.B.7 EXISTING RD/ESMTS.. Please correct the route number for Courthouse on the GPD sheets. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00006:28-35 TABLE 3.1 USES/STANDARDS Please show the zoning line between the B-2 and PD-1 areas. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Pleaseshow the existing bike trail along the side Courthouse Rd. Will this be relocated? (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Suggest adding a concrete median along Austin Ridge Dr. to prevent U-turns or left turns at the central right-in/right-out access point. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER CUP conditions to consider:Preservation of existing wooded areas. Limitations on illuminated signage facing adjacent properties that may include a residential use.Architectural standards to help with consistency with adjacent developments.Sidewalks along Austin Ridge Drive and pedestrian/bicycle connections into the site.Improvements along Austin Ridge Drive to direct or control traffic movement. |
| |
| PLANNING ENVIROMENT REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/22/2024 | 4/22/2024 | | Y |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS There are streams located on the property as well as hydric soils. A wetland delineation should be conducted on the property to determine the existence of wetlands/streams on the property and their location. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Streams located on site need to be assessed for perennial flow and CRPA designation/qualification and mapping. Please have an environmental consultant assess the stream for CRPA qualification and submit a Chesapeake Bay Compliance Plan Application for review and approval. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Impacts to wetlands may require a wetlands permit and impacts to the RPA may require administrative approval or Chesapeake Bay Board approval. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| PLANNING FIRE REVIEW | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | 4/29/2024 | 4/29/2024 | | N |
| PLANNING HISTORIC REVIEW | 1 | APPROVED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/2/2024 | 4/2/2024 | | N |
| PLANNING TRANSPORTATION REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 5/13/2024 | 5/13/2024 | | Y |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure for GPD
needs clarification. Sidewalks, Shared-use paths, and crosswalks need to be
shown along the frontage. Crosswalks specifically should be shown at Sunflower
Drive and at Buc-ees Blvd. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
The I-95 Northbound Exit still needs additional
improvements. Even with the improvements recommended, if traffic is still
significant, how will traffic blocking the NB ramp to EB on Courthouse Road or
traffic backing up onto I-95 be resolved? |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Median should be provided on Austin Ridge Drive.
Consider a thru-cut at Sunflower Drive and Austin Ridge Drive, and at Buc-ee’s
Blvd and Austin Ridge Drive. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
The entrance at Sunflower Drive should provide a
road that goes all the way to the back of the site. Rather than stop at the
store entrance where users have to go right or left. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Recommend to complete a secondary analysis in
the TIA without background development so we can understand Buc-ee’s specific
traffic impacts. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Stafford County has a transportation project at
the intersection of Route 1 and Courthouse Road to add additional turn lanes. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
What is the intention of the “Future” and “Proposed”
signalized intersections? Please provide clarification. |
| |
| Storm Water Management | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/24/2024 | 4/24/2024 | | Y |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2 update the firm map number and date |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1show LOD on the site plan |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant looked at the grading to determine the need for retaining walls |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant looked at the proposed grading to honor natural drainage divides and assess how SWM quality and quantity will be satisfied |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant coordinated with VDOT for any SWM facilities that will be required within VDOT ROW as the limited access highway improvements appear to be on the down-stream side of the proposed development. |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1the applicant is encouraged to assess grading and provide narratives for SWM compliance per 9VAC-870-66 and 9VAC-870-65. |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 1.1can the applicant provide more information on the basins to be removed. Also, it appears that SWM facilities are proposed to be removed, narratives will be required to state how the quality and quantity component of these facilities will be addressed with this proposed application. |
| |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 4/24/2024 | 4/1/2024 | 4/1/2024 | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL 4/1/24Please demonstrate the method of providing water and sanitary sewer to the site.The site is required to construct the Master Plan projects A-209 and A-106. |
| VA. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | N |
| Zoning Review | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | N |
| PROJECT MANAGER INITIAL REVIEW | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | N |
| ENGINEER | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | N |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL 4/1/24Please demonstrate the method of providing water and sanitary sewer to the site.The site is required to construct the Master Plan projects A-209 and A-106. |
| Sheriff's Review | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| PCPTED000001:SIGNAGE Due to the number of gas pumps and parking spots, I request the pump numbers be clearly visible to first responders as they approach the property. I also request the parking rowes are labeled and visible to the first responders as they approach. This could help in response times to emergencies in the parking lots and gas pump areas due to the size of this project. |
| PLANNING ENVIROMENT REVIEW | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS There are streams located on the property as well as hydric soils. A wetland delineation should be conducted on the property to determine the existence of wetlands/streams on the property and their location. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Streams located on site need to be assessed for perennial flow and CRPA designation/qualification and mapping. Please have an environmental consultant assess the stream for CRPA qualification and submit a Chesapeake Bay Compliance Plan Application for review and approval. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Impacts to wetlands may require a wetlands permit and impacts to the RPA may require administrative approval or Chesapeake Bay Board approval. (JPF 4/22/24) |
| |
| Storm Water Management | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2 update the firm map number and date |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1show LOD on the site plan |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant looked at the grading to determine the need for retaining walls |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant looked at the proposed grading to honor natural drainage divides and assess how SWM quality and quantity will be satisfied |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1has the applicant coordinated with VDOT for any SWM facilities that will be required within VDOT ROW as the limited access highway improvements appear to be on the down-stream side of the proposed development. |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 2.1the applicant is encouraged to assess grading and provide narratives for SWM compliance per 9VAC-870-66 and 9VAC-870-65. |
| |
| SWMCC.06:21.5-2.C.2 EXTND DTNTN RUNOFF sheet 1.1can the applicant provide more information on the basins to be removed. Also, it appears that SWM facilities are proposed to be removed, narratives will be required to state how the quality and quantity component of these facilities will be addressed with this proposed application. |
| |
| PLANNING TRANSPORTATION REVIEW | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure for GPD
needs clarification. Sidewalks, Shared-use paths, and crosswalks need to be
shown along the frontage. Crosswalks specifically should be shown at Sunflower
Drive and at Buc-ees Blvd. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
The I-95 Northbound Exit still needs additional
improvements. Even with the improvements recommended, if traffic is still
significant, how will traffic blocking the NB ramp to EB on Courthouse Road or
traffic backing up onto I-95 be resolved? |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Median should be provided on Austin Ridge Drive.
Consider a thru-cut at Sunflower Drive and Austin Ridge Drive, and at Buc-ee’s
Blvd and Austin Ridge Drive. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
The entrance at Sunflower Drive should provide a
road that goes all the way to the back of the site. Rather than stop at the
store entrance where users have to go right or left. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Recommend to complete a secondary analysis in
the TIA without background development so we can understand Buc-ee’s specific
traffic impacts. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
Stafford County has a transportation project at
the intersection of Route 1 and Courthouse Road to add additional turn lanes. |
| |
| PCPTED000010:OTHER 1.
What is the intention of the “Future” and “Proposed”
signalized intersections? Please provide clarification. |
| |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | | | | | Y |
| PMAJSPR00039:28-249.B.7 EXISTING RD/ESMTS.. Is the existing ROW cutting through the site being abandoned? Can this be utilized for access directly into site? (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00075:28-249.B.21 EXSTNG/PROPOSED ST There may be issues with stacking for vehicles exiting this site at the Sunflower Drive intersection. There is only one left turn lane exiting the site onto Austin Ridge Drive southbound towards Courthouse Road, which is the most direct exit point for traffic getting back towards I-95. The proposed entrances off of Austin Ridge Dr have little internal stacking area. Consider expanding internal stacking areas and adding a second left out at the signalized intersection. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00080:28-249.B.21 STREET NAME Please confirm that Buc-ee’s Blvd is an acceptable street name, as it was mentioned there is a Board resolution assigning a different name for this road. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Please provide sidewalks along Austin Ridge Dr. Consider making the sidewalks 8’ width for consistency with adjacent PD-2 developments. Also please provide internal sidewalks for safety from the parking lot to the store and gas station areas (consider something similar to Bass Pro Shops in Ashland). Consider adding a bike trail connecting the proposed bike plaza to the shared use path along Courthouse Rd. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00185:28-39.I.28 LANDSCAPING PLAN Please remove sheet C3.1 and the landscaping schedules and specific plantings shown on sheet C3.0. Proposed planting areas can be generally identified/shaded and dimensioned in layout view. Specific landscape requirements and planting arrangements are to be evaluated with site plan review. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00185:28-39.I.28 LANDSCAPING PLAN A 60' interstate buffer will be required where the property abuts the I-95 exit ramp. Please show this on the GDP. Consider preserving existing trees in this area and crediting them towards the landscape buffer requirement. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00235:28-87 PARKING LOT LIGHTING Please remove the parking lot lighting features, as they are reviewed under the site plan requirements and not a GDP. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00039:28-249.B.7 EXISTING RD/ESMTS.. Please correct the route number for Courthouse on the GPD sheets. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00006:28-35 TABLE 3.1 USES/STANDARDS Please show the zoning line between the B-2 and PD-1 areas. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Pleaseshow the existing bike trail along the side Courthouse Rd. Will this be relocated? (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER Suggest adding a concrete median along Austin Ridge Dr. to prevent U-turns or left turns at the central right-in/right-out access point. (mle) |
| |
| PMAJSPR00266:28 OTHER CUP conditions to consider:Preservation of existing wooded areas. Limitations on illuminated signage facing adjacent properties that may include a residential use.Architectural standards to help with consistency with adjacent developments.Sidewalks along Austin Ridge Drive and pedestrian/bicycle connections into the site.Improvements along Austin Ridge Drive to direct or control traffic movement. |
| |
Public Hearing Dates
