| Review Name | Review Number | Status | | Due Date | Start Date | Complete Date | | Comments |
| Application Review | 1 | APPROVED | | 3/18/2024 | 2/20/2024 | 2/20/2024 | | N |
| CODE SWM | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 4/8/2024 | 4/8/2024 | | Y |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheets 1 & Sheet 42: Add the Instrument # for the to the Maintenance Agreement Note on Sheet 42. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheets 1, 42, & 43. The Land Disturbance Certification on Sheet 1 states 7.03 acres for Impervious Area. Sheet 42 indicates 10.79 acres. Sheet 43 indicates 11.33 acres within the VRRM. Please verify and clarify, as needed. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 1 - Per the TOC and the sheets in the back, it appears that not all of the sheets related to the Ultimate Condition are included. The BMP Narrative, SWM Narrative, and Sheet Slow Narrative for the Ultimate Condition shall be included as a reference (AP23154983)....Sheet 48B of AP 23154983 indicates that the SWM Narrative is on this sheet but it appears to be only calculations, it looks like the SWM Narrative for the Ultimate Condition is on Sheets 48C & 48D. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 6: Please Label Section 2A on the Plan Sheet. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Please label the Sections on Sheet 7; this will aid in visualizing the sequencing for the sections. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 13 - Are Lots 394-400 apart of Section 4A? Sheet 8, it appears that Lots 394-400 are not designated. Then, the remaining units are all apart of Section 2B, correct? |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 8 - Please label Section 2B and Section 4A to serve as a point of reference. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 14 - Provide the outfall details for outfall at Structure 71. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: It appears that the Culvert between C5 and C6 is being installed apart of AP23154984 but that Structures 71, 72, and 72A along with the 15" RCP are apart of 24155491, is this correct? |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheets 39 & 40, indicate which structures will have a safety slab per VDOT SL-1. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 40 - Provide the sizing calculation and dimensions for the Energy Dissipation at Structure 71. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 421. Legend, the Impervious Area states "Phase I" next to 10.79 acres. What is the Phase I in reference too? Is it Phase I ESC or the activity associated with Section 2B & 4A?2. Legend, Area to Wet Pond is stating Phase I & 2, I am unsure what Sections are being referenced. Please clarify and/or revise. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 42: Plan View - 1. Delineate the Level Spreader in addition to the Conservation Area. So, it's clear that the Conservation Area is at the outfall of a Level Spreader. 2. For a point of reference please consider labeling Pond E on the Plan View (in lighter font). |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 42: BMP Narrative -1. 2nd paragraph - State that this Phase is addressing Section 2B and 4A construction (to clarify).2. 3rd paragraph - Consider indicating that the wet pond is Pond B.3. Reference the Ultimate Conditions (the Ultimate BMP Narrative, per AP23154983). |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 42: Provide the BMP table:Provide for all stormwater management facilities
and BMPs the following: a. A completed table with the following information; 1)
Stafford Co. Facility ID # (Leave Blank) 2) Facility Name 3) Facility Type 4) Latitude
Decimal Degrees (xx.xxxxxx) 5) Longitude Decimal Degrees (xx.xxxxxx) 6) VA HUC
6 7) Receiving Waters 8) Total Acres Treated and 9) Impervious Acres Treated. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheets 1, 42, & 43. The Land Disturbance Certification on Sheet 1 states 15.10 acres for Land Disturbance. Sheet 42 indicates 1321 acres of Land Disturbance. Please verify and clarify, as needed. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheet 46 and BMP Narratives - The Please clearly indicate what is Phase 1, etc. The Narrative on Sheet 46 is labeled "Phase 2B & 4A SWM Narrative" may want to restate as "Section 2B & 4A SWM Narrative". |
| |
| SHERIFF EXTERIOR SAFETY REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/18/2024 | 3/18/2024 | | Y |
| PCPTED000003:LIGHTING In the clubhouse parking lot there is a light planned in one of the two parking lot islands. In the same island two red maple trees are also planned to be planted. The light needs to be moved or other landscaping needs to be used. As the red maples mature the canopy will interfere with the light in the parking lot. |
| DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE/FLOODPLAIN REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 4/5/2024 | 4/5/2024 | | Y |
| PINFR0000152:28-57 FLOOD HAZARD REW1: DBIZ & Floodplain Notes - Note 5 states that there are 107 lots within the DBIZ, per the SWM Narrative there are 106 lots total. Please verify and revise as needed. |
| ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 2/27/2024 | 2/27/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ See email dated 2/27/23 for Engineer reviewer's comments for 1st review. |
| EROSION | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 4/9/2024 | 4/9/2024 | | Y |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Overall, the Phase I and Phase II ESC Plans are showing Sediment Basins being installed that are not delineated on the Grading Plan. 1. SB#8, SB#11, this affects the Gradin Plan on Sheets 12 & 13. The proposed grading needs to refect the sediment basins being installed / final contouring for Section 2B & 4A construction activity. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 47-49, Phase I ESC Plan Sheets1. Please retitle the Construction Sequence as "Phase I E&S", could state for Section 2B & 4A.2. Erosion Notes - Per the note the land disturbance is 15.00 acres, per the note on the Cover Sheet it's 15.10 acres, on Sheet 42 the Limits of Disturbance is 13.21 acres. Please verify the land disturbance for Section 2B & 4A construction activity and revise as needed.3. Erosion Notes - Add "and 4A' within the "section 2B....", to clarify the activity. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: ESC Phase Sheets -1. Provide the length and width dimensions for the outfalls of the pipes, sediment basins, and sediment traps (Outfall of the 24" CMP at SB#8, ST#1 outfall, ST#5 outfall, etc.). This data may be provided in a table.2. Label the sediment basins and sediment traps.3. Provide the Drainage Areas for all ESC measures (per the Applicaiton).....may be in call-out form where applicable.4. Provide a note that the Sediment Basin Construction Specifications are on Sheet 55. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 47 - The Diversion south of SB#8 is not tying into SB#8, address. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 47-49, Phase I ESC Plan Sheets -1. Delineate the stockpile area and the applicable erosion control measures.2. Delineate the areas that will receive Temporary Seeding (TS), currently it appears to only be applied on Sheet 48 between ST#5 and SB#12.3. Delineate the location of the rock check dams per VESCH Spec. 3.20. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 48- Per the EGP, Channel R-R is provided for the DD tying into ST#5. Please provide data. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: ESC Phase Plan Sheets1.Verify that the ESC measures are per VESCH.2. Verify that the legend is updated per the measures used for the specific ESC phase (CDs for Phase I ESC). |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 48: Delineate SB#12 per the EGP (per the EGP there is a baffle within SB#12). |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 50-52 - Phase II ESC - Notes, #3 - Verify the Land Disturbance and revise as needed (similar to the Phase I ESC comment). |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 50-52 - Phase II ESC - The final contouring on the Phase II Plan Sheets are not reflectign the contouring per the Grading Plan Sheets, address as needed. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 50 - What is the condition of SB#8 for Phase II ESC, it appears to be remaining but the proposed contours are not tying out and townhome lots are overlaying the perimeter of SB#8. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 51 - What is the condition of SB#11 for Phase II ESC, it appears to be remaining but the proposed contours are not tying out and it is not reflecting the Grading Plan, please address. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 50-52 - Phase II Construction Sequence1. When is SB#8 and SB#11 being transitioned/closed out. They appear to be remaining.2. When are the pads for the Townhomes being installed?3. Address at what point the Retaining Walls will be installed.4. Address the close-out of the sediment basins (can provide a subset construction sequence).5. Need to reflect items detailed on Sheet 53 for the Phase II Construction Sequence. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 51 -1. Label Pond E on Sheet 51, please state per EGP.2. There appear to be floating check dams (CD), I assume this is for Phase I, in conjunction with the DDs, please address as needed.3. What is the proposed contouring for ST#5 at this point? The perimeter of Lots 435-440 is laying on ST#5, it is confusing on what is occurring at this point.4. Per the ESC Table on Sheet 55, there are for rock check dams. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 53 -1. Revise the Consruction Sequence, as needed, to reflect revisions to the ESC Phase Plan Sheets.2. The Phase I Construction Sequence reflecting greater detail than what is on Sheets 47-49; provide similar detail on Sheets 47-49 and address any comments from those sheets.3. The Phase II Construction Sequence reflecting greater detail than what is on Sheets 50-52; provide similar detail on Sheets 50-52 and address any comments from those sheets. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 47-49 - Phase I Construction Sequence - Need to reflect items detailed on Sheet 53 for the Phase I Construction Sequence. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 47-49 - Delineate where Surface Roughening Per VESCH Spec. 3.29 will be utilized for slope stabilization. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES Sheets 51 & 56 - Per Sheet 51, it appears that SB#12 is being converted as part of this activity.1. Address this is Phase II construction sequence.2. Provide the "Procedure for Converting Sediment Basins" as per Sheet 32 of AP23154983 the EGP)....could place on Sheet 56. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Per Sheet 56, baffles are required for SB#8, SB#11, and SB#12; delineate on the ESC Phase Sheets and provide the VESCH Baffle specification detail. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Please provide a note addressing: Maintain positive drainage to the sediment traps and sediment basins. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REV1: Provide the applicable diversion channel calculations for the diversions greater then 2% slope. |
| |
| LANDSCAPE REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/20/2024 | 3/20/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Understory trees or large trees shall be utilized and space a maximum of 100 feet apart. When using understory trees in place of large trees, three (3) small shrubs must accompany the understory tree within the same maximum 100 foot interval. Many trees are space more than the maximum of 100 feet, and shrubs provided are not always accompanying the tree within the same 100 foot interval. Please revise planting locations to the meet the requirements. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Sheet 57: Area of Lot 250: the 3 JV's labeled don't appear to be shown. Please revise. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Sheet 57: Area of Lot 447- appears to be a conflict between the tree and light pole. Please revise. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Sheet 58: Area of Lot 434- on corner, tree appears to be within a storm drainage easement. Please verify with SWM reviewer if this is acceptable. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Sheet 58: Please verify frontage lengths labeled for Red Spruce Drive. The labels appear incorrect. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00081:DCSL 120.4 STREET TREES Sheet 58: Area of Lot 412- There are 3 shrubs and a tree that are not labeled. Please label. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00078:DCSL 120.1 PKING LOT, INTERIOR Sheet 58: For perimeter parking lot planting area on Magnolia Meadow Ln, please dimension and label the length. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00096:DCSL 153.0 PLANT SCHEDULES The landscaping schedules and plant schedule show small deciduous shrubs but they are not included in the landscaping legend and are incorrectly shown in plan view. Please create a symbol for small deciduous shrubs and revise them in plan view where incorrectly shown as a small evergreen shrub.Also, due to this, I'll need to verify number of plantings shown on next submission once corrected. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00096:DCSL 153.0 PLANT SCHEDULES Please verify length of street frontage listed on plant schedules. Some appear to be off based on what you have labeled in plan view or based on what it scaled at. Please verify and revise calculations as necessary. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00096:DCSL 153.0 PLANT SCHEDULES Please verify numbers of each plant type listed in the schedules compared to what is shown in plan view. Most appeared incorrect. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00092:DCSL 152.0 TYPE/SIZE CHARACTER Sheet 60: Plant Schedule- Please verify number of plants in plan view as I didn't get the same numbers as provided in the plan schedule. Also, please add 2" caliper for evergreen understory and 6' height for deciduous understory trees. Also, add height for New Jersey Tea. Are the evergreen and deciduous shrubs proposed large or small? The 30" requirement at time of planting is for large shrubs. Also, the "SA" should be "AS" to match label in plan view. (nd) |
| |
| PLANNING ADDRESS | 1 | APPROVED | | 3/18/2024 | 2/20/2024 | 3/11/2024 | | N |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/21/2024 | 3/21/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00222:22-26 TIME LIMIT Per Sec 22-26, this application must be approved within 18 months (on or prior to 8/20/2025) or will be deemed disapproved and closed. This comment will remain open until the application is ready for final approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00005:22-77.A SUBDIVISION NAME/SEC Sheet 1: Under subdivision name, please remove Parcel 37-30D since that is not part of this construction plan. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00005:22-77.A SUBDIVISION NAME/SEC Please add AP# 24155491. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00012A:22-77.A SHEET INDEXON COVER Please add total # of sheets under Sheet Index. Also, please label the individual sheets from the early grading plan as "For Information Only". (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ Sheet 3: Please list the required minimum Open Space Ratio near the running tabulation chart. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00015A:22-77.A TOTAL ACRES OF SITE Sheet 3: Site Specific Notes 1 and 2- Please remove Tax Map 37-30D since it doesn't apply to this specific construction plan. Please clarify the site area acreage (entire subdivision vs. acreage of TM 37-30A only). (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028C:22-77.D2 TOTAL AC OF EA LOT Sheet 3A: Lot tabulation chart- The total # of lots should be 107 instead of 106. The residual 37-30A acreage listed is probably actually including Tm 37-30D and Sec. 1 and 2A and shouldn't. Please break those out separately. Also would be helpful to have a total for the actual acreage of Sec 2B and 4A. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00025:22-77.D1 EXT LOT LNS BRG/DIST Sheet 4: Cannot locate Lines L1-L6. Please verify they are shown. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00024:22-77.D1 EXT ROW W/LR# & DIM Centreport Parkway has a typo (Centreport vs. Centerport). Please revise where labeled. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00031:22-77.D3 SEC LINE & PH Sheet 4 (and other sheets where shown): Please label Sections and A/P # for sections 1 and 2A. Label with new TM#'s if plat is recorded prior to this plan's approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ The Technical Change to the preliminary and the construction plan for Sec. 1 and 2A must be approved prior to this construction plan's approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00014:22-77.A OVERALL PLAN/INFO LGND Sheet 6: Please label open space parcels on overall plan. You have some open space areas labeled as "Residual Parcel TM 37-30A". Also, The row of TH lots adjacent to the dog park is not labeled with lot #'s. Please revise. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00039:22-77.K AMENITIES/GRAPHIC/NAR Please show the location of the tot lot adjacent to Lot 256 and parking as shown on the approved preliminary plan and proposed tech change. Also provide detail for playground equipment, any benches, etc. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00013:22-77.A MATCH-LINE KEY PLAN Sheet 8: On the key plan, please label the other portion of Section 2B. There are two separate rows of TH's that are not labeled with lot #'s. Please add. Also, we prefer "Residual" be changed to "Remainder" for the parent parcel remainder. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028C:22-77.D2 TOTAL AC OF EA LOT Please verify the s.f. labeled on each lot. Many appear incorrect (could be from the previous lot widths that were later changed). Also, please label sf/ac of each open space parcel. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00023:22-77.D1 EXT ESMTS W/LR#/DIM Easement Legend: The easement symbols for the "existing" SD and IE easements are reversed and don't match the description. Also, if the "existing" easements are recorded for the other sections prior to this plan's approval, please add the LR#. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ Please label cluster mailbox units and reference sheet where detail is located. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00023:22-77.D1 EXT ESMTS W/LR#/DIM Sheet 9: Should the ingress-egress easement located at the end of "existing" Cardinal Forest Drive be vacated since the extension of R/W will be dedicated to public use? I also noticed you're not showing the temporary parking to be removed on this plan. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028A:22-77.D2 PROPOSED LOTS Sheets 9-11 and maybe others: Parcel H is incorrectly labeled as Parcel F. Please revise. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028A:22-77.D2 PROPOSED LOTS Sheet 10: Lots 435-440- The end lots appear to scale at 35' wide but are labeled as 36'. Also, the middle lots are labeled as 20' wide but scale at 22' and are 22' on the tech change plan. Please verify and revise. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028:22-77.D2 PROP ST LOC/DIM/NAME Not sure if I made a comment on the other construction plan, but the ingress-egress easement streets are also part of the open space parcels. It may help clarify if you label them with the open space parcel they are within. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ Please more clearly delineate the boundary lines for the proposed open space parcels being created with these sections. Also, please more clearly delineate the section lines. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ Sheet 16: Please correct text overlap for graphic scale and w/s easement detail. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ Sheet 17: The w/s easement detail top right of sheet is a little off. Please correct. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00165:28-87 OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLAN Lighting:1) For the planner review, I'm only looking at the sidewalk values and calculations. The values shown in plan view on the actual sidewalks are farther apart than 10'. Please add more values.2) Sheet 61: Street tree conflict with light fixture. Please move one or the other.3) General Photometric Notes 5 and Mounting Height listed in Luminaire Schedule: Max mounting height for pedestrian scale fixtures is 14' per definition of "Lighting, Pedestrian Scale". Please revise.4) Luminaire Schedule: Please provide different symbols for the two different fixture types. Also, please add columns for luminaire pole color or finish and color temperature. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00038:22-77.K PROFFERS/IMPLEM PLAN Proffer 7: Proffer implementation states the streetscape plan has been submitted under separate cover, but I haven't received it. Please submit. (nd) |
| |
| PLANNING ENVIROMENT REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/15/2024 | 3/15/2024 | | Y |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS A
current wetlands jurisdictional confirmation letter from the USACE must be
present on the plan. (JPF 3/15/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS A copy
of an approved valid wetlands permit shall be present on the plan. (JPF 3/15/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS A copy of the CBCP approval letter shall be
present on the plan. (JPF 3/15/24) |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Please provide a notewith the name of the consultant who field delineated/surveyed the
Wetlands and CRPA. (JPF 3/15/24). |
| |
| PENVOTHER:28. OTHER ENV. VIOLATIONS Please add theFIRM note (on the coversheet): "The property shown
hereon is located in Zone (insert flood hazard area, i.e. zone), an area
determined to be (insert percent) annual chance flood, as graphically shown on
FIRM map community panel number (insert panel number), dated (last revised
FIRM)." (JPF 3/15/24) |
| |
| PLANNING FIRE REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/13/2024 | 3/13/2024 | | Y |
| FM125:FIRE LANES Fire lane signs need to be provided on Magnolia Meadow Lane between lots 406 and 407 on both sides of the street. (ACM) |
| |
| FM125:FIRE LANES Provide fire lane signs at the end turn around on Magnolia Meadow Lane (ACM) |
| |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Add a fire hydrant at the end of Wild Poppy Drive and Cardinal Flower Drive. (ACM) |
| |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Add a fire hydrant at the end of Wild Poppy Drive near lot 182. (ACM) |
| |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Relocate the fire hydrant near lot 447 to within the scope of the project phase. (ACM) |
| |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Relocate the fire hydrant at Magnolia Meadow Lane and Cardinal Flower Drive closer to the intersection. (ACM) |
| |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Relocate the fire hydrant at the turn around on Magnolia Meadow Lane to near the intersection. (ACM) |
| |
| PLANNING HISTORIC REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 2/21/2024 | 2/21/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00197:28-58 HISTORIC RESOURCE The parcel contains a historic feature.An archeological site was identified in a 1995 Phase I/Reconnaissance Survey conducted by KCI Technologies at the request of VDOT. The site is identified by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources as DHR ID 44ST0317 and is centrally located on Parcel 37-30A.In the Summary and Recommendations section of the Phase I Cultural Resources Identification Survey, site 44ST0317 (Prehistoric Lithic Scatter/Campsite) is identified as potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under criteria 'A' and 'D' with the recommendation that the site undergo further investigation to include a significance evaluation.A Phase II cultural resource survey is therefore recommended for this site. (NK) |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/18/2024 | 3/18/2024 | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlan Reviewer Contact InformationDavid Zehrdzehr@staffordcountyva.gov540-658-5189 |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlease ensure the latest fire flow results are being used for the fire flow note. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1Add this note to the cover sheet:
“The public sanitary sewer infrastructure needed for
Centreport Village - Sections 2B & 4A AP#24155491 will be installed with Centreport Village - Sections 1 & 2A AP#23154984. The Applicant for Centreport Village - Sections 2B & 4 will be/is responsible for installing any/all downstream/offsite public sanitary sewer infrastructure in the event that AP#23154984is not able to
install the infrastructure. Centreport Village - Sections 2B & 4Acannot obtain a water meter
and/or the Certificate of Occupancy until all downstream/offsite public
sanitary sewer is constructed with plan Ap#23154984and all onsite public water
and public sanitary sewer constructed with this plan (AP# 24155491) is built,
tested, tentatively accepted by Stafford County, and in service.” |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 7 - Conceptual Future Overall ExhibitLabel all tax map numbers and phasing sections (IE 1, 2A, 2B, 4). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 7 - Conceptual Future Overall ExhibitGeneral comment for the plan - Everything from sections 1 & 2A needs to be shown and labeled as "Future to be built with AP#23154984" instead of existing. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanShow the stationing for both the proposed water and sanitary sewer. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanEnsure there is a valve every 800' on the proposed water. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanLabel angles of deflection angles through sanitary manholes (Stafford Design Standards - Sewer, Section 3.2.4). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanMake sure water service connections do not conflict with any proposed water fittings - the connection for lot 443 seems to be on top of a reducer. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanProvide an easement around water line 'c' stub out at the end of Wild Poppy Drive. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanClearly label connection methods for water tie-ins. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanLabel sanitary cleanout's and reference note #9, it is difficult to see them at the property line. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanEnsure a 10' minimum distance between the sanitary laterals and water meters. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanProvide an easement around the length of sanitary sewer that expands past the end of Wild Poppy Drive to manhole M4. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanMake sure all text is uniform (ex. note #2 is bolded for some reason), |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanPlease revise note #8. Construction of manholes within a sidewalk or other pedestrian travel ways is prohibited (Stafford Design Standards - Sewer, Section 3.2.1). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanShow any and all dry utilities and associated easements. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 16 - Utility and Easement PlanSee comments sheet 15. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 17 - Utility and Easement PlanSee comments sheet 15. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 27 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesAdd lot numbers and applicable parcels/tax map numbers |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 27 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesAdd sanitary sewer stationing in plan views. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 27 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesClearly label all sanitary and storm manholes, pipes, etc. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 27 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesSmooth out the waterline's profile going under the storm crossing at station 28+94. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 28 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesSee comments sheet 27. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 28 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesPlan view for waterline 'c' does not match it's profile. The plan view calls out a fire hydrant at station 10+00 that is not shown in profile. Please reconcile and revise as needed. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 29 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesSee comments sheet 27. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsPlease provide a digital copy of the Sections 2A & 4B sanitary calculations for review. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsUse the border for this plan on sheets 30 and 31. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsHas the sanitary sewer design for the entire site been approved yet? |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsPlease double check sanitary lateral depths. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsRuns G2-G1, and H11-H - The absolute minimum allowable velocity for sanitary sewer is 1.3 fps (Stafford County Design Standards - Sanitary, Section 3.1.4); please revise. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesFor future reference, water service lines do not need to be shown in profile. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesLabel all existing/future utilities in plan views. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesShow and label proposed easements in plan view. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesEnsure a minimum 0.2' elevation change across manholes (Stafford Design Standards - Sewer, Section 3.1.4). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesManhole M4 requires an internal drop connection (Stafford Design Standards - Sewer, Section 3.2.2). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesLabel all manholes subject to vehicular traversal as traffic rated. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesFor the stub into future M5, show the entire run of pipe between M4 and M5. Make sure to label the fill condition. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesFor the stub into future M8, show the entire run of pipe between M4 and M8. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesAdd parcel/tax map numbers to plan views where applicable. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesAdd vertical scale bars to all water and sanitary sewer plan and profiles sheets (Stafford County Design Standards - General, Section 1.2.2). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesSee comments Sheet 32. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesMake sure manhole labels in plan view are clearly visible. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesFor all water and sanitary sewer plan and profiles, ensure everything other than the water and sanitary sewer are faded back. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesLabel and station the water lines in plan view. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesMake sure all sanitary sewers are stationed in plan view. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 33 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesWhy is SDR-26 being used between H and H11? |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 58 - Landscape PlanRemove the three JV plantings from the easement around the fire hydrant at the corner of Magnolia Meadow Lane and Cardinal Flower Drive. Only ornamental grasses are allowed in Water-Sanitary Sewer Easements (Stafford Design Standards - General, Section 1.1.6). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 65-66 - Water and Sewer Notes and DetailsRemove details 1.4.1-11B, 1.4.2-2A, and 1.5.1-1. Add detail 3.3.3-4 if you will be tapping a future water line. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 67 - Water and Sewer Notes and DetailsRemove water modeling note. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL General Comment -Add coordinate labels to all plan view sheets (Stafford Design Standards - General, Section 1.2.2). |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL General Comment -More comments will be generated upon resubmission. |
| |
| VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/8/2024 | 3/8/2024 | | N |
| PROFFER/IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW | 1 | FAILED | | 3/18/2024 | 3/22/2024 | 3/22/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00038:22-77.K PROFFERS/IMPLEM PLAN Sheet 72: Please address the following regarding the proffer implementation plan...1) Proffer #2 - Comment to remain open, pending approval of stormwater review.2) Proffer #3 - Narrative appears to have a typo? 107 SFH units proposed with this plan, but states total of 167 units at this time. Please clarify/correct as necessary.3) Proffer #7 - Narrative states that streetscape plan has been submitted under separate cover. Streetscape plan has not been seen/received to date, but should be provided/incorporated into this plan set. (AGT) |
| PLANNING HISTORIC REVIEW | 2 | APPROVED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/12/2024 | 8/12/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00197:28-58 HISTORIC RESOURCE The parcel contains a historic feature.An archeological site was identified in a 1995 Phase I/Reconnaissance Survey conducted by KCI Technologies at the request of VDOT. The site is identified by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources as DHR ID 44ST0317 and is centrally located on Parcel 37-30A.In the Summary and Recommendations section of the Phase I Cultural Resources Identification Survey, site 44ST0317 (Prehistoric Lithic Scatter/Campsite) is identified as potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under criteria 'A' and 'D' with the recommendation that the site undergo further investigation to include a significance evaluation.A Phase II cultural resource survey is therefore recommended for this site. (nk) |
| ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION | 2 | APPROVED | | 8/19/2024 | 7/29/2024 | 7/29/2024 | | N |
| PLANNING FIRE REVIEW | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/16/2024 | 8/16/2024 | | Y |
| FM128:OPERATIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS Add a fire hydrant at the end of Wild Poppy Drive near lot 182. (ACM) UPDATE 8/16/24: The hydrant provided is behind a temporary barricade. Relocate to the side of the street to ensure access. |
| PLANNING ENVIROMENT REVIEW | 2 | APPROVED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/1/2024 | 8/1/2024 | | N |
| SHERIFF EXTERIOR SAFETY REVIEW | 2 | APPROVED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/19/2024 | 8/19/2024 | | N |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 9/18/2024 | 9/18/2024 | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlan Reviewer Contact InformationDavid Zehrdzehr@staffordcountyva.gov540-658-51899/18/24Util reviewer Claudia Wrightcwright@staffordcountyva.gov540-658-8653 |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlease ensure the latest fire flow results are being used for the fire flow note.9/18/24Please add the approval date to the Fire Flow note on the cover sheet.Add note 1.1.3 to the cover sheet:1.1.3 Utility Coordination The design engineer shall coordinate water and sanitary sewer design with storm drains, landscaping, lighting, gas, cable, phone, electricity, etc., so that there are no conflicts. The location of both future and existing utilities must be shown on the construction plans and profiles. The design engineer shall be responsible for obtaining precise locations of all existing utilities and physical features through field surveys and current record locations. It may be necessary for the engineer to commission the installation of test holes to verify existing utility line locations. The test hole information shall be shown on the plan and profile views. The contractor shall call "Miss Utility" at 811 at least three (3) business days in advance of initiation of construction.Pro-rata charts online have not been updated. This parcel is in the Garrisonville Pressure Zone $4.26 |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 7 - Conceptual Future Overall ExhibitLabel all tax map numbers and phasing sections (IE 1, 2A, 2B, 4).9/18/24Sheet 4:The existing conditions sheet is not legible.Label ex FH and Ex MH with GIS labels1.2.2Drawings will be acceptable only if all lines and lettering thereon are concise, legible, reproducible, and are readily capable of being digitally reproduced.All lettering for the same set of plans shall be of the same style, open, well-formed, dense black and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing.Each plan set shall include an existing condition sheet(s) clearly showing all existing utilities, pavements, easements, structures, and topography.The scale to be used for all drawings shall be as follows: Plan Views: 1" = 50' (1" = 30' for high-density multi-family developments)Sheets 6-8:Not legible cannot read lot numbers, etc see Sec 1.2.2 of DSM |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanShow the stationing for both the proposed water and sanitary sewer.9/18/24Sheet 15:-Dimension all w-ss esmts-label ROW, ep, c&g, sidewalks...etc-where is the sampling station?Water sampling stations shall be installed in each subdivision, townhouse complex, apartment complex, and other such residential projects. Sampling stations shall be installed at the rate of one (1) station per 100 equivalent residential units, or fraction thereof. Where multiple stations are required, they shall be evenly distributed within the project.-label bends, gate valves, etc-no 90 degree bends-why on street Wild Poppy Drive, does san sew continue but not the waterline for the future lots?-Label the method of tie-in for water and san sew to the future lines-FH on Wild Poppy will be in the road when road is extended. Please move-label retaining walls on all util sheets |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanEnsure a 10' minimum distance between the sanitary laterals and water meters.9/18/24-the 10ft min is required between the water meter and san sew cleanout. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 15 - Utility and Easement PlanPlease revise note #8. Construction of manholes within a sidewalk or other pedestrian travel ways is prohibited (Stafford Design Standards - Sewer, Section 3.2.1).9/18/24Sheets 15-17:Note 8 does not state that manholes in sidewalks or other pedestrian traffic ways are prohibited |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 16 - Utility and Easement PlanSee comments sheet 15.9/18/24Sheet 16:-label all bends-no 90 degree bends-what is going on at W/L F at station 13+94 cannot read, please label clearly-what is going on at W/L E cannot read label clearly-why does W/L F not continue like sew to future?-label method of tie in for water and san sew to fut-label gate valves-label all DIP waterlines as zinc-coated |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 27 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesAdd lot numbers and applicable parcels/tax map numbers9/18/24-waterline B has a long dead end to the FH; please add an automatic flushing hydrant as well. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 28 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesSee comments sheet 27.9/18/24-Move the FH that will be in the road when the road is extended. station 13+55.39 |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 29 - Waterline Plan and ProfilesSee comments sheet 27.9/18/24Sheet 29:-no 90degree bends |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsPlease provide a digital copy of the Sections 2A & 4B sanitary calculations for review.9/18/24San sew design under review |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 32 - Sanitary Sewer ProfilesLabel all existing/future utilities in plan views.9/18/24Sheet 31:lots 183-186 and 381-386 as future lots on spreadsheetsheet 33:-MH M is future not existing-stub is future-overlapping textM4 to M8 and M4 to M5 cannot change pipe type in a run of san sew...all shall be SDR-35 |
| |
| VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/21/2024 | 8/21/2024 | | N |
| LANDSCAPE REVIEW | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/16/2024 | 8/16/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00096:DCSL 153.0 PLANT SCHEDULES Please verify numbers of each plant type listed in the schedules compared to what is shown in plan view. Most appeared incorrect. (nd)***8/16/24 PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULES FOR CLOVER CREST LANE INTERIOR AND PERIMETER PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MAY BE SHORT 2 TREES FOR INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING AND THEREFORE SHORT ON PLANT UNITS. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. ALSO, FOR THE MAGNOLIA MEADOW LANE INTERIOR PARKING LOT SCHEDULE, THE TOTAL PLANTING AREA PROVIDED IS 572 SQ FT BASED ON WHAT IS LABELED IN PLAN VIEW. PLEASE REVISE SCHEDULE AND ADD 1 TREE AS REQUIRED. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00092:DCSL 152.0 TYPE/SIZE CHARACTER Sheet 60: Plant Schedule- Please verify number of plants in plan view as I didn't get the same numbers as provided in the plan schedule. Also, please add 2" caliper for evergreen understory and 6' height for deciduous understory trees. Also, add height for New Jersey Tea. Are the evergreen and deciduous shrubs proposed large or small? The 30" requirement at time of planting is for large shrubs. Also, the "SA" should be "AS" to match label in plan view. (nd)***8/16/24 PLANT SCHEDULE- THE TOTAL FOR DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY SHOULD BE 37. PLEASE ADD 2" CALIPER TO EVERGREEN UNDERSTORY TREES ONLY (AS LISTED IN SEC. 152.0(B) OF THE DCSL FOR EVERGREEN TREES). (ND) |
| |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/15/2024 | 8/15/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00222:22-26 TIME LIMIT Per Sec 22-26, this application must be approved within 18 months (on or prior to 8/20/2025) or will be deemed disapproved and closed. This comment will remain open until the application is ready for final approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ The Technical Change to the preliminary and the construction plan for Sec. 1 and 2A must be approved prior to this construction plan's approval. (nd) ***8/15/24 THE TECHNICAL CHANGE TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAN WAS APPROVED 4/10/24. THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR SEC 1 AND 2A MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO THIS CONSTRUCTION PLAN'S APPROVAL. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00014:22-77.A OVERALL PLAN/INFO LGND Sheet 6: Please label open space parcels on overall plan. You have some open space areas labeled as "Residual Parcel TM 37-30A". Also, The row of TH lots adjacent to the dog park is not labeled with lot #'s. Please revise. (nd) ***8/15/24 THERE IS STILL ONE "REMAINDER PARCEL TM 37-30A" LABEL SHOWN ON OPEN SPACE H. PLEASE REMOVE. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00028C:22-77.D2 TOTAL AC OF EA LOT Please verify the s.f. labeled on each lot. Many appear incorrect (could be from the previous lot widths that were later changed). Also, please label sf/ac of each open space parcel. (nd) ***5/18/24 SHEET 9, LOT 289: PLEASE VERIFY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. BASED ON LOT DIMENSIONS, WOULD BE 2,737 SF. ALSO, SHEET 10, LOT 434: LOT NO LONGER ABUTS RED SPRUCE DRIVE, THEREFORE SIDE SETBACK SHOULD NOW BE 15' INSTEAD OF 8'. PLEASE REVISE. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00023:22-77.D1 EXT ESMTS W/LR#/DIM Easement Legend: The easement symbols for the "existing" SD and IE easements are reversed and don't match the description. Also, if the "existing" easements are recorded for the other sections prior to this plan's approval, please add the LR#. (nd) ***8/15/24 WILL KEEP THIS COMMENT OPEN UNTIL PLAN READY FOR FINAL APPROVAL TO VERIFY IF "EXISTING" EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN RECORDED AND LR#'S NEED TO BE ADDED. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00165:28-87 OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLAN Lighting:1) For the planner review, I'm only looking at the sidewalk values and calculations. The values shown in plan view on the actual sidewalks are farther apart than 10'. Please add more values.2) Sheet 61: Street tree conflict with light fixture. Please move one or the other.3) General Photometric Notes 5 and Mounting Height listed in Luminaire Schedule: Max mounting height for pedestrian scale fixtures is 14' per definition of "Lighting, Pedestrian Scale". Please revise.4) Luminaire Schedule: Please provide different symbols for the two different fixture types. Also, please add columns for luminaire pole color or finish and color temperature. (nd)***8/15/24 REMAINING LIGHTING COMMENT: THE 6.5 MAX VALUE FOR RED SPRUCE DRIVE SIDEWALK IS ACTUALLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT AND NOT ACTUAL RED SPRUCE DRIVE. PLEASE REVISE. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00038:22-77.K PROFFERS/IMPLEM PLAN Proffer 7: Proffer implementation states the streetscape plan has been submitted under separate cover, but I haven't received it. Please submit. (nd) ***8/15/24 THE STREETSCAPE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL ON 3/29/24. I WILL DEFER TO THE PROFFER REVIEWER TO DETERMINE IF THE PROFFER HAS BEEN SATISFIED. (ND) |
| |
| PROFFER/IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/22/2024 | 8/22/2024 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00038:22-77.K PROFFERS/IMPLEM PLAN Sheet 72: Please address the following regarding the proffer implementation plan...1) Proffer #2 - Comment to remain open, pending approval of stormwater review.2) Proffer #3 - Narrative appears to have a typo? 107 SFH units proposed with this plan, but states total of 167 units at this time. Please clarify/correct as necessary.3) Proffer #7 - Narrative states that streetscape plan has been submitted under separate cover. Streetscape plan has not been seen/received to date, but should be provided/incorporated into this plan set. (AGT)*** 8/22/24 (REW-2) - 1) Comment regarding proffer #2 to remain open, pending approval of stormwater review... and streetscape plan to be presented to PC on 8/28/24 for comment and non-binding review. Any comments received will be forwarded to the applicant for consideration. (AGT) |
| DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE/FLOODPLAIN REVIEW | 2 | APPROVED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/14/2024 | 8/14/2024 | | N |
| CODE SWM | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/21/2024 | 8/21/2024 | | Y |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW1: Sheets 1, 42, & 43. The Land Disturbance Certification on Sheet 1 states 15.10 acres for Land Disturbance. Sheet 42 indicates 1321 acres of Land Disturbance. Please verify and clarify, as needed.REW2: Sheet 46 - Sections 2B & 4A SWM Narrative - The narrative is currently stating 15.10 acres of disturbed area while 14.94 acres have been confirmed. Please revise the narrative. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW2: Sheet 46 - Sections 2B and 4A SWM Narrative - Throughout the narrative, please revise the 9VAC25-870(subsections) references to the applicable 9VAC25-875(subsections) to reflect the current regulations as of July 1, 2024. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW2: Delineate the 10-yr and 100-yr WSE related to the Culvert 5-6 on Sheet 14. |
| |
| Cycle Complete | 1 | INCOMPLETE | | 4/9/2024 | 4/9/2024 | | N |
| EROSION | 2 | FAILED | | 8/19/2024 | 8/21/2024 | 8/21/2024 | | Y |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Overall, the Phase I and Phase II ESC Plans are showing Sediment Basins being installed that are not delineated on the Grading Plan. 1. SB#8, SB#11, this affects the Gradin Plan on Sheets 12 & 13. The proposed grading needs to reflect the sediment basins being installed / final contouring for Section 2B & 4A construction activity.REW2:SB8: Per a conversation with Bowman on 8/21/2024, the area for SB#8 will delineate the final grading as shown on Sheet 12. A note will be provided for SB#11 to address when the sediment basin is scheduled to be close-out.SB#11: Per a conversation with Bowman on 8/21/2024, the plan is to address with a note/call-out at what point it will be closed-out. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: ESC Phase Sheets -1. Provide the length and width dimensions for the outfalls of the pipes, sediment basins, and sediment traps (Outfall of the 24" CMP at SB#8, ST#1 outfall, ST#5 outfall, etc.). This data may be provided in a table.2. Label the sediment basins and sediment traps.3. Provide the Drainage Areas for all ESC measures (per the Applicaiton).....may be in call-out form where applicable.4. Provide a note that the Sediment Basin Construction Specifications are on Sheet 55.REW2:4. May be overlooking. On Sheets 47 & 48, provide a note that the Sediment Basin Construction Specifications are on Sheet 55. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheet 47 - The Diversion south of SB#8 is not tying into SB#8, address.REW2: Please tie in the Dd, south of SB#8, in with the EC-2 lining along the side-slope. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 47-49, Phase I ESC Plan Sheets -1. Delineate the stockpile area and the applicable erosion control measures.2. Delineate the areas that will receive Temporary Seeding (TS), currently it appears to only be applied on Sheet 48 between ST#5 and SB#12.3. Delineate the location of the rock check dams per VESCH Spec. 3.20.REW2:1. Delineate the perimeter of the stockpile area and ESC measures for the stockpile.3. Per Sheet 54, the VESCH Specification detail for a Rock Check Dam is provided. If not utilizing, please remove from Sheet 54. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES REW1: Sheets 50-52 - Phase II Construction Sequence1. When is SB#8 and SB#11 being transitioned/closed out. They appear to be remaining.2. When are the pads for the Townhomes being installed?3. Address at what point the Retaining Walls will be installed.4. Address the close-out of the sediment basins (can provide a subset construction sequence).5. Need to reflect items detailed on Sheet 53 for the Phase II Construction Sequence.REW2: Per a conversation with Bowman on 8/21/2024, the area for SB#8 will delineate the final grading as shown on Sheet 12. A note will be provided for SB#11 to address when the sediment basin is scheduled to be close-out. |
| |
| ESCPLN.011:6-14 LOCATIONS OF PRACTICES Sheets 51 & 56 - Per Sheet 51, it appears that SB#11 is being converted as part of this activity.1. Address this is Phase II construction sequence.2. Provide the "Procedure for Converting Sediment Basins" as per Sheet 32 of AP23154983 the EGP)....could place on Sheet 56.REW2: Per a conversation with Bowman on 8/21/2024, the plan is to address with a note/call-out at what point it will be closed-out. |
| |
| SWMSTORM.001:STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REW2: Add the easement related to Culvert 5 & 6. addressing the 10-yr storm event, per AP23154984 (Section 1 & 2A). |
| |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 3 | FAILED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/10/2025 | 2/10/2025 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00222:22-26 TIME LIMIT Per Sec 22-26, this application must be approved within 18 months (on or prior to 8/20/2025) or will be deemed disapproved and closed. This comment will remain open until the application is ready for final approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00023:22-77.D1 EXT ESMTS W/LR#/DIM Easement Legend: The easement symbols for the "existing" SD and IE easements are reversed and don't match the description. Also, if the "existing" easements are recorded for the other sections prior to this plan's approval, please add the LR#. (nd) ***8/15/24 WILL KEEP THIS COMMENT OPEN UNTIL PLAN READY FOR FINAL APPROVAL TO VERIFY IF "EXISTING" EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN RECORDED AND LR#'S NEED TO BE ADDED. (ND) |
| |
| PCONSUB00165:28-87 OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLAN Lighting:1) For the planner review, I'm only looking at the sidewalk values and calculations. The values shown in plan view on the actual sidewalks are farther apart than 10'. Please add more values.2) Sheet 61: Street tree conflict with light fixture. Please move one or the other.3) General Photometric Notes 5 and Mounting Height listed in Luminaire Schedule: Max mounting height for pedestrian scale fixtures is 14' per definition of "Lighting, Pedestrian Scale". Please revise.4) Luminaire Schedule: Please provide different symbols for the two different fixture types. Also, please add columns for luminaire pole color or finish and color temperature. (nd)***8/15/24 REMAINING LIGHTING COMMENT: THE 6.5 MAX VALUE FOR RED SPRUCE DRIVE SIDEWALK IS ACTUALLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT AND NOT ACTUAL RED SPRUCE DRIVE. PLEASE REVISE. (ND)***2/10/25: I only counted 19 of the light fixtures at 10' mounting height in plan view. Please verify. (nd) |
| |
| LANDSCAPE REVIEW | 3 | APPROVED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/10/2025 | 2/10/2025 | | N |
| PLANNING FIRE REVIEW | 3 | APPROVED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/21/2025 | 2/21/2025 | | N |
| VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION | 3 | FAILED | | 2/24/2025 | 3/10/2025 | 3/10/2025 | | N |
| CODE SWM | 3 | APPROVED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/24/2025 | 2/24/2025 | | N |
| EROSION | 3 | APPROVED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/24/2025 | 2/24/2025 | | N |
| PROFFER/IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW | 3 | APPROVED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/25/2025 | 2/25/2025 | | N |
| Cycle Complete | 2 | INCOMPLETE | | 9/19/2024 | 9/19/2024 | | N |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 3 | FAILED | | 2/24/2025 | 2/26/2025 | 2/26/2025 | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlease ensure the latest fire flow results are being used for the fire flow note.9/18/24Please add the approval date to the Fire Flow note on the cover sheet.Add note 1.1.3 to the cover sheet:1.1.3 Utility Coordination The design engineer shall coordinate water and sanitary sewer design with storm drains, landscaping, lighting, gas, cable, phone, electricity, etc., so that there are no conflicts. The location of both future and existing utilities must be shown on the construction plans and profiles. The design engineer shall be responsible for obtaining precise locations of all existing utilities and physical features through field surveys and current record locations. It may be necessary for the engineer to commission the installation of test holes to verify existing utility line locations. The test hole information shall be shown on the plan and profile views. The contractor shall call "Miss Utility" at 811 at least three (3) business days in advance of initiation of construction.Pro-rata charts online have not been updated. This parcel is in the Garrisonville Pressure Zone $4.262/25/25Please note the Fire Flow data is over a year old. This plan is fine, but all plans submitted after this one will need to request new flow data to update the water model. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 7 - Conceptual Future Overall ExhibitLabel all tax map numbers and phasing sections (IE 1, 2A, 2B, 4).9/18/24Sheet 4:The existing conditions sheet is not legible.Label ex FH and Ex MH with GIS labels1.2.2Drawings will be acceptable only if all lines and lettering thereon are concise, legible, reproducible, and are readily capable of being digitally reproduced.All lettering for the same set of plans shall be of the same style, open, well-formed, dense black and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing.Each plan set shall include an existing condition sheet(s) clearly showing all existing utilities, pavements, easements, structures, and topography.The scale to be used for all drawings shall be as follows: Plan Views: 1" = 50' (1" = 30' for high-density multi-family developments)Sheets 6-8:Not legible cannot read lot numbers, etc see Sec 1.2.2 of DSM2/25/25Sheet 4:DSM Section 1.2.2Each plan set shall include an existing condition sheet(s) clearly showing all existing utilities,
pavements, easements, structures, and topographyAll lettering for the same set of plans shall be of the same style, open, well-formed, dense black
and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing. Minimum height of letters shall
be:
Notes – one-eighth inch (1/8") and legibly spaced.
Titles – one-fourth inch (1/4").This means that the existing water and sanitary sewer lines shall be clearly visible and labeled size and material. There related esmts shall be labeled with LR#. All water and san sew that is not built is labeled as future. The san sew that is needed for this site, needs to be labeled as future with ap # and the esmts need to be recorded and the LR# labeled. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsPlease provide a digital copy of the Sections 2A & 4B sanitary calculations for review.9/18/24San sew design under review2/25/25Centreport Village 2B and 4A must provide the downstream capacity calculation in the San Sew calculation. Please provide the flow for only Sections 1 and 2A plus 2b and 4A (167 homes) in order to evaluate the capacity of the downs stream Sanitary sewer pipes in which you are connecting to. |
| |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 4 | FAILED | | 5/12/2025 | 4/29/2025 | 4/29/2025 | | Y |
| PCONSUB00222:22-26 TIME LIMIT Per Sec 22-26, this application must be approved within 18 months (on or prior to 8/20/2025) or will be deemed disapproved and closed. This comment will remain open until the application is ready for final approval. (nd) |
| |
| PCONSUB00223:22 & 28 OTHER INFO REQ ***PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE FROM THE PRELIMINARY PLAN TO THIS PLAN AS WELL AS ALL OTHER PLANS AND PLATS FOR CENTREPORT VILLAGE:"STAFFORD REGIONAL AIRPORT: THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROXIMITY TO STAFFORD REGIONAL AIRPORT, SPECIFICALLY THE AIRPORT IMPACT AREAS AND AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC PATTERN AREAS AROUND THE AIRPORT, AS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFFORD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STAFFORD REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS LIKELY TO BE SUBJECT TO AIRCRAFT OVERFLIGHT AND NOISE IMPACTS OF VARYING DEGREES." COMMENT MAY BE ADDRESSED AT SIGNATURE SET. (ND) |
| |
| UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REVIEW | 4 | APPROVED | | 5/12/2025 | 5/5/2025 | 5/5/2025 | | Y |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 1 - Cover SheetPlease ensure the latest fire flow results are being used for the fire flow note.9/18/24Please add the approval date to the Fire Flow note on the cover sheet.Add note 1.1.3 to the cover sheet:1.1.3 Utility Coordination The design engineer shall coordinate water and sanitary sewer design with storm drains, landscaping, lighting, gas, cable, phone, electricity, etc., so that there are no conflicts. The location of both future and existing utilities must be shown on the construction plans and profiles. The design engineer shall be responsible for obtaining precise locations of all existing utilities and physical features through field surveys and current record locations. It may be necessary for the engineer to commission the installation of test holes to verify existing utility line locations. The test hole information shall be shown on the plan and profile views. The contractor shall call "Miss Utility" at 811 at least three (3) business days in advance of initiation of construction.Pro-rata charts online have not been updated. This parcel is in the Garrisonville Pressure Zone $4.262/25/25Please note the Fire Flow data is over a year old. This plan is fine, but all plans submitted after this one will need to request new flow data to update the water model. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 7 - Conceptual Future Overall ExhibitLabel all tax map numbers and phasing sections (IE 1, 2A, 2B, 4).9/18/24Sheet 4:The existing conditions sheet is not legible.Label ex FH and Ex MH with GIS labels1.2.2Drawings will be acceptable only if all lines and lettering thereon are concise, legible, reproducible, and are readily capable of being digitally reproduced.All lettering for the same set of plans shall be of the same style, open, well-formed, dense black and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing.Each plan set shall include an existing condition sheet(s) clearly showing all existing utilities, pavements, easements, structures, and topography.The scale to be used for all drawings shall be as follows: Plan Views: 1" = 50' (1" = 30' for high-density multi-family developments)Sheets 6-8:Not legible cannot read lot numbers, etc see Sec 1.2.2 of DSM2/25/25Sheet 4:DSM Section 1.2.2Each plan set shall include an existing condition sheet(s) clearly showing all existing utilities,
pavements, easements, structures, and topographyAll lettering for the same set of plans shall be of the same style, open, well-formed, dense black
and have a consistent density throughout the entire drawing. Minimum height of letters shall
be:
Notes – one-eighth inch (1/8") and legibly spaced.
Titles – one-fourth inch (1/4").This means that the existing water and sanitary sewer lines shall be clearly visible and labeled size and material. There related esmts shall be labeled with LR#. All water and san sew that is not built is labeled as future. The san sew that is needed for this site, needs to be labeled as future with ap # and the esmts need to be recorded and the LR# labeled. |
| |
| UTIL.003:GENERAL Pg. 30 - Sanitary Sewer CalculationsPlease provide a digital copy of the Sections 2A & 4B sanitary calculations for review.9/18/24San sew design under review2/25/25Centreport Village 2B and 4A must provide the downstream capacity calculation in the San Sew calculation. Please provide the flow for only Sections 1 and 2A plus 2b and 4A (167 homes) in order to evaluate the capacity of the downs stream Sanitary sewer pipes in which you are connecting to. |
| |
| Cycle Complete | 3 | INCOMPLETE | | | 3/13/2025 | 3/13/2025 | | Y |
| NewCycle:Corrected Plan Submission Required |
| VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION | 4 | APPROVED | | 5/12/2025 | 4/29/2025 | 4/29/2025 | | N |
| PLANNING PLANNER REVIEW | 5 | APPROVED | | | 5/16/2025 | 5/16/2025 | | N |
| Cycle Complete | 4 | INCOMPLETE | | | 5/5/2025 | 5/5/2025 | | Y |
| NewCycle:Corrected Plan Submission Required |
| PROJECT MANAGER FINAL REVIEW | 1 | APPROVED | | 6/9/2025 | 5/16/2025 | 5/16/2025 | | N |
| AGENT REVIEW | 1 | APPROVED | | | 5/23/2025 | 5/23/2025 | | N |
Public Hearing Dates
